Many large high schools and
some schools for lower and middle school students employ either active duty
police officers or special school security officers. Obviously these personnel cost the schools
money. One would presume that the money
would not be spent unless the administrators determined that the extra security
was needed to prevent violence and aggression.
Does the presence of a security force in a school, whether private or
public, make kids feel more secure and behave more appropriately?
Clearly exceptions to the
rule always get the attention of the media rather than the normal and customary
every day occurrence. So, last August
when a video was released by the American Civil Liberties Union showing a
school resources officer handcuffing a whimpering 8-year-old special education
student people were outraged. What could
an 8-year-old do that would warrant such treatment? More recently videos of a high school student
in South Carolina being whipped from her desk/chair and thrown on the floor
because she did not comply with an order from a sheriff’s deputy assigned to
the school became viral. The deputy was
removed from his job although the sheriff said the deputy had a great record
and was experienced. Turns out the
“crime” committed by the girl was being disrespectful and using her cell phone
in class.
Schools began incorporating a
policing presence after high-profile instances of mass shootings in schools
such as Columbine High School and Sandy Hook Elementary. But there is an old saying. If you are a hammer, everything looks like a
nail. One can only wonder if you are a
police officer or a school resource officer trained to perform disciplinary
actions against people breaking the rules, do you tend to see lots of rule
breaking? If you are a classroom teacher
and you are confronted with a smart-mouthed teenager, how easy is it for you to
call in the reinforcements? In fairness
if you are a trained law enforcement person, school duty can get pretty
boring. It is also not unusual for these
altercations to lead to police arrest and the beginning of a juvenile police
record.
Many years ago principals
were allowed to paddle kids as part of disciplinary procedures. Mostly that practice has been outlawed. It is my view that we do not teach kids that
violence is a bad thing by committing violence against them, whether by a
paddling principal or by law enforcement personnel.
School is a place where
children should be learning. The act of
learning is itself a risk-taking behavior.
If a person tries to learn there is always the risk of failing. Learning can only happen in an environment
where a child feels safe. If school
becomes a place where children see law enforcement as out to get them, what
will that do to their attitude in the larger community. And if a school is not safe to live in, how
will it be a place where it is safe to learn?
Instead of an SRO in every school, how 'bout we fund a f/t social worker and/or school psychologist (with an *actual* Md/PhD) to support students who have behavior challenges/difficulty expressing anger in appropriate ways? Let's call it a behavior intervention plan! It will identify observable antecedents to inappropriate behaviors, provide positive reinforcement to promote good behavior, and give necessary supports for students to be able to identify when they are moving into crisis mode along with immediately available resources which are known to work for each student? Hmmmm.... imagine that! Preparing a student for life? Nah. Let's just cuff 'em.
ReplyDeleteI am curious why THS has chosen not to keep their doors locked. It is the only school I know that allows everyone to come in freely. I personally would like to see better control on who can and can not come in but if there is a reason behind not locking, I would like to know too. Thanks. Steffani Mykins
ReplyDeleteAll outside doors but the front door are kept locked. We do not lock the front door, but our receptionists at both campuses have a clear view of the front door and know just about everyone who comes in.
ReplyDelete