Don't talk to kids

 Don’t Talk to Kids

 

Don’t talk to kids as if they were children.   They don’t like it and you will be thought to be lacking in respect in their minds.  Children are quite remarkable in so many ways.   One is that they are hardwired with a BS meter.   They know when a person is pandering to them.  This meter begins to lose its effectiveness as we age.

The trick to speaking with kids is to speak to them as you would to an adult.   Of course, you need to filter for content, but you also need to be as truthful as possible.

Students in the lowest reading group know they are in the lowest reading group regardless of what we name that group.  So just call the group by the name of the book they are reading or the skill set on which they are working.

Avoid using language that isn’t true.   If a loved one is dying and the chances of recovery are slim, make sure the child knows that the person is very sick and might not get well.  If the religious belief system offers the hope of a heaven, then you can say the person might be going to heaven soon.

If a child asks the reason for a specific rule, give them the real reason not a made up one.   For example, our school has a rule that from middle school onward, boys may not wear sweatpants or other athletic wear to school.  When asked, we don’t soft peddle the reason.   Adolescent boys have involuntary erections that are plainly visible in soft pants and not so much in jeans or other fly front pants.   Boys might be initially embarrassed by the reason but they get it and appreciate the honesty.

Unlike adults, kids can take the truth and don’t appreciate cover up.  As we grow older, we hide from the truth.  We will tell another adult something is very attractive even when the little voice in our head says otherwise.   On the other hand, a child will flat out say “I don’t like that”.  

It is also true that children are not ready for some content.  It is perfectly ok to say, I can’t explain that now or I will tell you more when you are older.  Will some kids tell you they are ready now- definitely.  But it’s also ok to taking the responsibility of the adult and say you are the adult and you disagree.

I was babysitting a child and we were picking a movie to watch.  He selected one for “mature adults only”.  I told him, no his mom had rules and I would obey those rules.  He asked if the issue was sex.   I said probably.  Then he told me I didn’t need to worry because he knew all there was to know about sex.   He was 12 at the time, I didn’t know whether to be sad for him or really worried.

How dumb are we?

 How dumb are we?

 

The Blueprint for Education that the Maryland legislature passed a couple of years ago has a provision to increase teacher planning and collaboration time from the 20% of the day it is now to 40% of the day.   There is NO evidence that any real research was done to see if doing that would improve the quality of education for the children in these teachers classes.

What it would do is cost a great deal of money!  It is estimated that 15,000 additional teachers would be needed to implement this plan without increasing current class sizes.  Don’t let it bother you but we can’t find the teachers we need to fill the existing openings let alone add 15k MORE.  And, of course, there is a cost to that.  Assuming ( and yes I know the first 3 letters in the word assume) that all 15k teachers start at the beginning salary of $60,000, that would cost 900 MILLION DOLLARS.   Add another 18% for benefits, an additional 162 MILLION DOLLARS and you are looking at 1 BILLION dollars.  Is it any wonder the Governor decided to pause this element of the great plan.  Just think if those 15,000 teachers were hired to decrease class sizes instead of giving teachers more planning time with the same size or larger classes?   

It is not clear how or why that magical number of 40% of a teacher’s time for planning was determined.   It is said that a camel is a horse designed by a committee, so maybe a committee came up with that number.   

Of course, the teachers’ union thinks that a fine idea.   After all, 15,000 more teachers means more members and more dues collected.  Even though the Supreme Court has determined that requiring teachers to be members of the union and collecting payroll deductions for dues is not legal, the union has managed to include that provision in their collective bargaining.

In the coming years, when the true price tag for the Blueprint begins to come due and more importantly when results begin to be measured against the cost, the Blueprint might become more of a “red” print.’

The State Superintendent has made it her mission to put the Science of Reading in every beginning elementary school classroom.  She says she has lots of research evidence to back up the worthiness of the cost.   Where is the research that backs up the cost vs. the benefit of the Blueprint investment?   Or is this just another case of throwing money at the wall and see what sticks?   Really, how dumb are we?

Where have all the teachers gone?

 Where have all the teachers gone?

 

Gone to other jobs everyone.   When will we ever learn?   Sorry Pete Seeger.  But the lyrics seemed to fit.  Once again, the issue of not enough teachers has surfaced.

A part of the Blueprint for Education in Maryland has been delayed because there aren’t teachers for the present situation, so the idea of implementing something that would require more teachers was dismissed.   The Maryland State Department of Education is about to implement a program called The Science of Reading.  This program that is heavily phonics based is supposed to have students on grade level in reading by the end of grade 3.   If the students are not, they will either be retained in grade 3 or, at the parent’s request, move on to grade 4 but the parents need to agree to after school tutoring and/or summer programming.  The instruction will still be based on The Science of Reading, but that’s a story for another day.

What does need to be thought about is where are the school systems going to find the space and the teachers to expand the number of children in third grade and/or provide the after school and summer instruction.  That will also cost money.  

The same type of people who gave us the Blueprint and the Read by Grade 3 are trying to figure out how to get more folks to be teachers.   The first plan is to raise teachers’ salaries to $60,000 right out of college with no experience.  So far, that isn’t working very well.  Another plan is to change the licensing requirements for new and experienced teachers.   Certificates are gone and as of last April all teachers have licenses.  It is no long necessary for teachers to earn a Master’s Degree.  School folk have long noticed that the pay jump for the advanced degree cost more money but didn’t correspondingly increase teaching ability.   

So why don’t people want to be teachers any more.  One reason is that women (the predominant gender for teaching) have far more opportunities for job choices than they used to have.  They can earn more money, have more authority over how they do their jobs and even have respect.   Another reason is that teaching isn’t all that pleasant any more.   The profession does not receive the respect from the parent community that it used to have.   Secondly, with pacing guides and teaching guides, teaching has become the profession of processed food.   The documents lay out each step of teaching and grant no grace to the good sense of the teacher to slow down, speed up or even CHANGE the content to suit the learner.  Teaching is one of the few “professions” that is not controlled by the professionals but rather by bureaucrats and politicians.    Education organizations are largely to blame for this as they have become more unions advocating for health and welfare benefits rather than professional associations fighting for control of their own profession.

Have any of the bureaucrats held focus groups with successful teachers and ask them how to increase the teacher pool??

Where have all the teachers gone, gone to get some respect everyone.

 

 Here we go again…

 

Every time there is tight money and schools are looking for a place to cut, it’s the arts that go on the chopping block.

Besides funding, schools are worried about attendance.   This is not a change of subject.

For many kids with learning challenges, they are only coming to school for the arts portion of their day.   In Maryland, children between 5 and 18 are required to attend school. If traditional school learning is a challenge for you, that means a life sentence of failure.  Every day someone will demonstrate that you are not as smart (read not as good as) some of your peers.   Yet you gotta go every day because that’s the law.  So you figure out ways to avoid the daily punishment.   You skip school whenever you can; you feign illness.   For many children, the only reason to come to school, the only place where their other skills count, is the arts.

Instruction in visual arts, music and theatre always lags behind the “important” subjects of English, math, science and history/social studies.   Reading on grade level is now the holy grail of education based on the new policy passed by the State Board of Ed and the new Superintendent.

The Blueprint for Maryland’s Future is very specific about how local districts can spend their money.  Seventy-five percent of the State funds must go for the pillars in the Blueprint.   That leaves the remaining 25% for everything else, including the arts.   Advocates for the arts tried to get those areas included in the Blueprint along with other content areas.   They failed.   The arts are generally considered an added extra, the icing on the cake that can easily be done without.  State regulations require instruction in the arts but there are no specifics as to how that requirement is met.

Maryland is facing a 3 billion dollar budget deficit so budget cutting is more likely than budget enhancement.

No district in Maryland gets more money from the Blueprint than Baltimore City because of its high concentration of students living in poverty.   It can also be argued that no district in the state is in greater need of providing arts education to struggling learners and to kids whose families are unlikely able to supplement the school programs with cultural experiences.   The City also has a HUGE attendance problem. The arts could help solve this problem.   Frederick and Howard counties are both proposing to cut arts programming.

Give the kids a reason to come to school.   Give them a space to shine and show their other abilities.  Why is school just for the academically talented kids?