Who Wants to be a principal?
Turns out not too many people
are all that interested. In the DC
public schools, one in four schools has had at least three principals since
2012. The common wisdom is that a principal
should stay in a school at least five years to implement his/her vision and to
build community support. That is just
not happening. For once in education the issue is not salary. Principals are paid relatively well. There are multiple other factors that are at
play in this constant churn.
Since No Child Left Behind,
principals have been evaluated by the test scores of the children in their
buildings, just as teachers are evaluated by the test scores of students in
their classes. Many principals want to
be in districts where the socio-economic levels lead to higher test
scores. So, principals with seniority
get to get transferred within the present district to a “better” school. Others want to get out of the system all
together and seek out other school systems.
Being kicked to the central
office in a school system is often a very good thing. That means no more teacher personnel issues,
not more haunting test scores and no more complaining parents. Many principals work hard to land what are
perceived as easier jobs at the same or higher salary. There used to be a time when being a
principal was the aspirational job. That
isn’t true anymore.
And the unions are not making
it any better. Unions are all too ready
to sacrifice the right of students to a decent teacher at the alter of keeping
jobs for union members. Most big school systems have a holding tank of
teachers in reserve. Many of these
people are in the ready reserve because they are in the process of having their
employment terminated. That termination is, of course, being fought by the union. Others have lost
positions because of being excessed by other principals for budget cuts. A new policy of the New York City school
system is requiring principals to select new staff from this pool. Many of the teachers in this pool are there
for disciplinary reasons and shouldn’t be in a classroom at all.
School systems are getting
better at keeping principals in schools but the forces of union protectionism,
rating principals based on test scores of students, and limiting the
principal’s authority to hire and fire, all conspire to keep the weakest
principals in the schools that are in the most desperate need of good
leadership. But then again, who wants
to be a principal anyway?
No comments:
Post a Comment