How much is good enough?
Ever since 1975 children with
disabilities have been promised a free, appropriate public education
(FAPE). The question is, what exactly
does that mean? The courts have pretty much
decided that free means at no cost to the parents. Therefore, schools cannot charge back to a
parent’s health care policy the cost of related services such as speech or
occupational therapy that might look like a health care cost that is covered by
the parent’s health care insurance. In doing the
charge back, the parent’s benefits under that policy could be diminished;
thereby, incurring a cost to the parent.
One of the bigger issues has
been, what exactly equals appropriate.
There is no question but that is a kind of wishy washy word. One parent’s appropriate is one school
system’s over the top expectation.
Consequently, parents have done what Americans always do, they have gone
to court. The courts have all agreed
that to be appropriate the child must receive educational benefit from the
education.
However, even the courts
cannot agree on what exactly is educational benefit.
In Endrew vs. Douglas County
School District, the Justices of the Supreme Court have agreed to take up this
very question. The U.S. Court of Appeals
for the 10th Circuit, in Denver, ruled last year that a Colorado
student with autism had received “some educational benefit” from his Individual
Education Plan (IEP) before his parents withdrew him over a dispute with the
school district. However, at least one
other federal appeals court has adopted a standard requiring that the IEP
provide a “meaningful benefit” in order to provide FAPE. Of course, meaningful is not exactly measurable either but it does give parents some leverage over the word "some" that could mean anything at all.
The Obama administration has
said that the interpretation of the 10th Circuit is out of synch
with the text, structure and purpose of the Individuals With Disabilities
Education Act (IDEA). Now it will be
up to the Supreme Court to decide. The
Court is working with only eight Justices so that will also have a bearing on
the outcome.
If the Court decides to go
with the higher standard, many school districts across the country are going to
be impacted. One of the criteria for
children receiving paid tuition in non-public approved schools is the failure
of the local school district to deliver FAPE.
If the Court comes down on the side of “some” a lot of kids are going to
be shortchanged. But if the Court goes
in the other direction, good enough will also need to be meaningful.
No comments:
Post a Comment