And you thought he was a Democrat?

 And you thought he was a Democrat?

 

As the Governor of Maryland begins to unveil his cost cutting budget to come up with about 3B in savings, it’s interesting to see on whose backs the cuts are being made.

First there is the move to cover his tracks.   In the state of Maryland there is a law that requires every Governor to put enough money into the budget for basic state aide that reflects the previous year's amount PLUS an additional contribution equal to the increase in the cost of living.   This additional amount is called the Maintenance of Effort.   As a result of this requirement, EVERY Governor gets to say, “I put more money in the budget for education than any other governor before me”.  And yep this Governor did, just as every governor has done since the law went into effect.

The other thing the Governor did was reduce the per pupil basic aide by $162, bringing the aide down to the required Maintenance of Effort.   This reduction will cost local school systems millions of dollars when the amount is multiplied by the number of kids in the school system.   For Baltimore County that's about 18M.  For Anne Arundel, it's about 14M.  Nothing to sneeze at.

Secondly, in addition to basic state aid, the State contributes what is known as “excess cost” toward the cost of the State’s contribution to non-public school placement.  Children are placed in approved non-public schools when the local system acknowledges it cannot appropriately serve that child.  The formula is very complicated.   Presently, the State pays 70% of this excess cost.   The Governor is recommending that be reduced to 60%.   At the present time, depending on what a school district spends on a plain student’s education, some school systems pay NO county funds for a non-public placement and others pay a great deal less than the published tuition.  (Betcha you didn’t know that!)

The Governor is also cutting funds for the Developmental Disabilities Administration (DDA).   DDA supports adults with disabilities.   It does this by providing day placements in programs, providing funds for families to keep their adult children with disabilities at home, and by paying aides to care for adults with disabilities.   That’s hard work.   The positions don’t pay much and are difficult to fill.  There is a long waiting list for people who are approved for service to actually get that service.   Sometimes years pass between qualifying for service and actually receiving that service.

The Governor is doing worse than not providing a cost of living increase, he is CUTTING service for a program where there is already a long waiting list AND when it is already difficult to find staff.   Ultimately, this is a dumb way to save money because in the short run the DDA support funds keep adults out of more expensive services.   The Governor is cutting 200 MILLION dollars from an agency that was already short staffed and with a long waiting list.

Then there is Mr. Trump.   He has said all along that he plans to do away with the federal Department of Education (DOE).   So why does that matter?   Not so much and a great deal!   All money for children with disabilities flows through the DOE.   Most of that money comes from the Individuals with Disabilities Act (IDEA).  The federal government has NEVER supported IDEA to the extent the law provides- think 40% in the law and about 5% in reality.  If DOE were to go away, the money would probably come through another government agency.  But DOE is also a watchdog agency to make sure that the various states and local school systems obey the requirements of the law.   Without DOE there would be no one to do that.

We all had some early warning signs about Mr. Trump but who would have guessed what Governor Moore is doing.   And we thought he was a Democrat.

 Don’t take it for granted.

 

It’s been 50 years since the US Congress decided that every child, including those with disabilities, were entitled to a free and appropriate education.   When President Gerald Ford signed the bill into law, he made a point of saying he was signing the bill because of the political pressure but he was sure, the goal of the bill would never happen.

Here we are fifty years later, and the goal of the law has happened.   In fact, the original Education of all Handicapped Children Act (EHA) has been amended several times to expand the entitled services and the name has morphed into Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA).

Besides the instructional program, children with disabilities are supposed to be provided occupational and physical therapy, speech therapy, family counseling, transition services to assist in the move to jobs or college.   Transportation to the services the child needs is also guaranteed.  In fact, a school district can say it doesn’t have enough teachers for art or even science so the students won’t get those services.   But if the child has a disability, he or she is in a special protected class and must receive those services regardless of the financial condition of the school district.

Does all that happen as required by law.   Absolutely not!   School systems don’t have enough OT’s so kids don’t get OT.   They don’t have enough speech therapists so ditto on speech.   The law requires the service if the student needs it.  So the work around is, the school systems just says the child doesn’t need the service and if the child doesn’t need the service there can be no consequence to the school system not providing the service.

Law for children with disabilities has morphed into a whole new class of legal expertise.   Families that can, spend a great deal of money hiring advocates and special lawyers to get their children what the law has required for half a century.

If children aren’t getting services when the law requires it, think what might happen if the laws were changed.  Be vigilant, don’t take what you have for granted.  Someone may be waiting to take it away.

 

Don't talk to kids

 Don’t Talk to Kids

 

Don’t talk to kids as if they were children.   They don’t like it and you will be thought to be lacking in respect in their minds.  Children are quite remarkable in so many ways.   One is that they are hardwired with a BS meter.   They know when a person is pandering to them.  This meter begins to lose its effectiveness as we age.

The trick to speaking with kids is to speak to them as you would to an adult.   Of course, you need to filter for content, but you also need to be as truthful as possible.

Students in the lowest reading group know they are in the lowest reading group regardless of what we name that group.  So just call the group by the name of the book they are reading or the skill set on which they are working.

Avoid using language that isn’t true.   If a loved one is dying and the chances of recovery are slim, make sure the child knows that the person is very sick and might not get well.  If the religious belief system offers the hope of a heaven, then you can say the person might be going to heaven soon.

If a child asks the reason for a specific rule, give them the real reason not a made up one.   For example, our school has a rule that from middle school onward, boys may not wear sweatpants or other athletic wear to school.  When asked, we don’t soft peddle the reason.   Adolescent boys have involuntary erections that are plainly visible in soft pants and not so much in jeans or other fly front pants.   Boys might be initially embarrassed by the reason but they get it and appreciate the honesty.

Unlike adults, kids can take the truth and don’t appreciate cover up.  As we grow older, we hide from the truth.  We will tell another adult something is very attractive even when the little voice in our head says otherwise.   On the other hand, a child will flat out say “I don’t like that”.  

It is also true that children are not ready for some content.  It is perfectly ok to say, I can’t explain that now or I will tell you more when you are older.  Will some kids tell you they are ready now- definitely.  But it’s also ok to taking the responsibility of the adult and say you are the adult and you disagree.

I was babysitting a child and we were picking a movie to watch.  He selected one for “mature adults only”.  I told him, no his mom had rules and I would obey those rules.  He asked if the issue was sex.   I said probably.  Then he told me I didn’t need to worry because he knew all there was to know about sex.   He was 12 at the time, I didn’t know whether to be sad for him or really worried.

How dumb are we?

 How dumb are we?

 

The Blueprint for Education that the Maryland legislature passed a couple of years ago has a provision to increase teacher planning and collaboration time from the 20% of the day it is now to 40% of the day.   There is NO evidence that any real research was done to see if doing that would improve the quality of education for the children in these teachers classes.

What it would do is cost a great deal of money!  It is estimated that 15,000 additional teachers would be needed to implement this plan without increasing current class sizes.  Don’t let it bother you but we can’t find the teachers we need to fill the existing openings let alone add 15k MORE.  And, of course, there is a cost to that.  Assuming ( and yes I know the first 3 letters in the word assume) that all 15k teachers start at the beginning salary of $60,000, that would cost 900 MILLION DOLLARS.   Add another 18% for benefits, an additional 162 MILLION DOLLARS and you are looking at 1 BILLION dollars.  Is it any wonder the Governor decided to pause this element of the great plan.  Just think if those 15,000 teachers were hired to decrease class sizes instead of giving teachers more planning time with the same size or larger classes?   

It is not clear how or why that magical number of 40% of a teacher’s time for planning was determined.   It is said that a camel is a horse designed by a committee, so maybe a committee came up with that number.   

Of course, the teachers’ union thinks that a fine idea.   After all, 15,000 more teachers means more members and more dues collected.  Even though the Supreme Court has determined that requiring teachers to be members of the union and collecting payroll deductions for dues is not legal, the union has managed to include that provision in their collective bargaining.

In the coming years, when the true price tag for the Blueprint begins to come due and more importantly when results begin to be measured against the cost, the Blueprint might become more of a “red” print.’

The State Superintendent has made it her mission to put the Science of Reading in every beginning elementary school classroom.  She says she has lots of research evidence to back up the worthiness of the cost.   Where is the research that backs up the cost vs. the benefit of the Blueprint investment?   Or is this just another case of throwing money at the wall and see what sticks?   Really, how dumb are we?

Where have all the teachers gone?

 Where have all the teachers gone?

 

Gone to other jobs everyone.   When will we ever learn?   Sorry Pete Seeger.  But the lyrics seemed to fit.  Once again, the issue of not enough teachers has surfaced.

A part of the Blueprint for Education in Maryland has been delayed because there aren’t teachers for the present situation, so the idea of implementing something that would require more teachers was dismissed.   The Maryland State Department of Education is about to implement a program called The Science of Reading.  This program that is heavily phonics based is supposed to have students on grade level in reading by the end of grade 3.   If the students are not, they will either be retained in grade 3 or, at the parent’s request, move on to grade 4 but the parents need to agree to after school tutoring and/or summer programming.  The instruction will still be based on The Science of Reading, but that’s a story for another day.

What does need to be thought about is where are the school systems going to find the space and the teachers to expand the number of children in third grade and/or provide the after school and summer instruction.  That will also cost money.  

The same type of people who gave us the Blueprint and the Read by Grade 3 are trying to figure out how to get more folks to be teachers.   The first plan is to raise teachers’ salaries to $60,000 right out of college with no experience.  So far, that isn’t working very well.  Another plan is to change the licensing requirements for new and experienced teachers.   Certificates are gone and as of last April all teachers have licenses.  It is no long necessary for teachers to earn a Master’s Degree.  School folk have long noticed that the pay jump for the advanced degree cost more money but didn’t correspondingly increase teaching ability.   

So why don’t people want to be teachers any more.  One reason is that women (the predominant gender for teaching) have far more opportunities for job choices than they used to have.  They can earn more money, have more authority over how they do their jobs and even have respect.   Another reason is that teaching isn’t all that pleasant any more.   The profession does not receive the respect from the parent community that it used to have.   Secondly, with pacing guides and teaching guides, teaching has become the profession of processed food.   The documents lay out each step of teaching and grant no grace to the good sense of the teacher to slow down, speed up or even CHANGE the content to suit the learner.  Teaching is one of the few “professions” that is not controlled by the professionals but rather by bureaucrats and politicians.    Education organizations are largely to blame for this as they have become more unions advocating for health and welfare benefits rather than professional associations fighting for control of their own profession.

Have any of the bureaucrats held focus groups with successful teachers and ask them how to increase the teacher pool??

Where have all the teachers gone, gone to get some respect everyone.

 

 Here we go again…

 

Every time there is tight money and schools are looking for a place to cut, it’s the arts that go on the chopping block.

Besides funding, schools are worried about attendance.   This is not a change of subject.

For many kids with learning challenges, they are only coming to school for the arts portion of their day.   In Maryland, children between 5 and 18 are required to attend school. If traditional school learning is a challenge for you, that means a life sentence of failure.  Every day someone will demonstrate that you are not as smart (read not as good as) some of your peers.   Yet you gotta go every day because that’s the law.  So you figure out ways to avoid the daily punishment.   You skip school whenever you can; you feign illness.   For many children, the only reason to come to school, the only place where their other skills count, is the arts.

Instruction in visual arts, music and theatre always lags behind the “important” subjects of English, math, science and history/social studies.   Reading on grade level is now the holy grail of education based on the new policy passed by the State Board of Ed and the new Superintendent.

The Blueprint for Maryland’s Future is very specific about how local districts can spend their money.  Seventy-five percent of the State funds must go for the pillars in the Blueprint.   That leaves the remaining 25% for everything else, including the arts.   Advocates for the arts tried to get those areas included in the Blueprint along with other content areas.   They failed.   The arts are generally considered an added extra, the icing on the cake that can easily be done without.  State regulations require instruction in the arts but there are no specifics as to how that requirement is met.

Maryland is facing a 3 billion dollar budget deficit so budget cutting is more likely than budget enhancement.

No district in Maryland gets more money from the Blueprint than Baltimore City because of its high concentration of students living in poverty.   It can also be argued that no district in the state is in greater need of providing arts education to struggling learners and to kids whose families are unlikely able to supplement the school programs with cultural experiences.   The City also has a HUGE attendance problem. The arts could help solve this problem.   Frederick and Howard counties are both proposing to cut arts programming.

Give the kids a reason to come to school.   Give them a space to shine and show their other abilities.  Why is school just for the academically talented kids?

Keep that spin going...

 Keep that spin going…

 

A few weeks ago, eleven students with autism and their seven teachers were denied service at a Cracker Barrell restaurant in Waldorf, Maryland.   The teacher in charge had called the Cracker Barrel and asked if they needed a reservation or anything else.  They were told no.   The lunch visit is part of a program to assist kids with significant disabilities to participate in the community.   Cracker Barrel had been part of the program.  The students are all on the autism spectrum and moderately disabled.

Upon arrival at the restaurant, the students and teachers were told they could not be served.  The teachers volunteered to break into smaller groups so that the grouping would be more typical.  They were still refused by the server, the assistant manager and the manager.   They waited 1 hour for carry out which they ate back in their classroom.

The incident went viral.  The county superintendent wrote a strongly worded letter.  Community groups were up in arms.

Corporate Cracker Barrel said the local staff would be spoken to, but the restaurant was too crowded to accommodate such a large group even though the group had asked in advance if it was ok.  

So, on the one hand, corporate said “we did not refuse service to this student group, but operational breakdowns caused by staffing shortages and poor communication on our part led us to fall well short of our service standards”.   Okay, service was not refused because that would be an admission of violating the Maryland public accommodation law.

On the other hand, Corporate said it was firing three employees at that Cracker Barrel including the general manager.  And they would be “moving forward with specialized training for all employees at this particular store” and that it has a “zero-tolerance policy against any form of discrimination”.  Makes sense, who wants to admit to breaking the law?

Representatives from Cracker Barrel have met with the school system and said they would like to continue to participate in the program.

So here is the confusion- your staff did nothing wrong but you fired them anyway??? Hmmm, that is curious.

Why not do a huge mea culpa and invite the kids to lunch, with the treat on Cracker Barrel?  Oh because then all those funny looking kids would be in your restaurant.  And so the spin goes on.