Bad school or bad economy
The Maryland State Department of Education (MSDE) released the scores for the Maryland Comprehensive Assessment Program (MCAP) last week. The worst scores were in Baltimore City and Somerset County, even though both jurisdictions raised their scores just not as much as the rest of the state.
The scores also indicated which jurisdictions did the best and which schools within those jurisdictions had the highest scores. In both instances, it was the county and the schools with the highest socio-economic status that did the best.
The highest level of kids living in poverty is Baltimore City (29.5%). First runner-up is, you guessed it, Somerset County (29.4%. ) A dubious honor at best. These kids don’t have parents with the time or energy to insist on homework, come to school meetings, make sure health care is provided. Not to mention a good breakfast and lunch. Then there is the issue of unions which allow seasoned teachers to pick the best schools leaving the least experienced teachers to struggle along with the kids.
If we want to see better achievement in our kids we need to start with improving their lives. Many kids who live in poverty live with parents whose school achievement isn’t much better than the child which is one explanation for lack of a better paying job for the adult.
In a school with high poverty, teachers have to cope with vandalism to their vehicles. Kids who come to school hungry, kids fighting public transportation if they live in the City, violence in the neighborhood, and sometimes having to stay home to watch younger siblings because there is no one else to do it. Teachers who teach in wealthier jurisdictions have first world problems: pushy parents who demand more of their kids and the school, expect higher achievement and offer after school tutoring to get it.
In the meantime, the Blueprint for Maryland’s educational future thinks giving teachers 40% of their day for planning while costing a fortune is somehow going to improve the educational achievement of those poor kids.
Some countries require that all young adults serve their communities for two years, either in the military or in community service. What would happen if in order to achieve an advanced pay status in a school district, experienced teachers would have to show they could do well in a lower socio-economic school? Sort of like military service. What would happen if instead of spending millions of dollars for teachers to have 40% of their time to plan instead of the 20% they have now, those millions were spent on after school care and tutoring in the poorest schools? That would keep kids off the streets AND make sure they had some structured remediation time.
That won’t happen because the teachers unions are the fattest pigs at the trough of public funding and we seem to be more comfortable blaming the bad schools rather than their bad economies.
